From 1 January 2026, registrars who were training under the Rural Generalist Training Scheme (RGTS) transitioned to the Australian General Practice Training (AGPT) funded pathway of the ACRRM Rural Generalist Fellowship Program.
Unifying the funding pathways enabled ACRRM to offer a training program with greater clarity, simplicity and funding equity for registrars, training posts and supervisors.
Day-to-day training for registrars remained the same following their transition to AGPT. Education delivery, training requirements, placement processes and assessments remained unchanged.
The consolidation streamlined training delivery, and registrars can now access financial support and incentives through the ACRRM Flexible Funds program in line with the Nationally Consistent Payments (NCP) framework.
Employee arrangements
Registrars who were engaged by their primary care training post on a contractor basis were required to transition to an employee arrangement that met at least the minimum conditions outlined in the National Terms and Conditions for the Employment of Registrars (NTCER) in time for Semester 1, 2026.
Learn about the consolidation through ACRRM & GPRA's webinar.
Note: information was correct at the time of recording (October 2025).
Supervisors and training posts who previously engaged RGTS registrars can learn about how the changes affect their day-to-day work.
From 1 January 2026, ACRRM registrars who transitioned to AGPT as part of the consolidation should have:
Registrars should contact their training program advisor if they have not completed any of these steps or require support.
We know every registrar’s situation is different. To make things clearer, we’ve outlined some common scenarios that show how payments, education, and contractor arrangements have changed since the consolidation.
Dr Smith commenced their AST placement in Semester 2, 2025 under the RGTS. They will continue in the same AST placement into Semester 1, 2026, after the program transitions to the consolidated ACRRM Rural Generalist Fellowship Program.
In Semester 2, 2025, Dr Smith received their registrar support payment as usual under RGTS.
When Semester 1, 2026 begins, their payments will shift to the National Consistent Payments (NCP) Framework with access to ACRRM Flexible Funds.
An assessment will be conducted to ensure Dr Smith is not disadvantaged. If there is a gap between what they received under RGTS and what they are entitled to under NCP, the balance will be paid to them in 2026.
Dr Smith would have been eligible to receive a payment of $9,250 per semester under RGTS (totaling $18,500 for the year). By transitioning to AGPT, Dr Smith would have a funding gap of $12,500.
Dr Smith will be eligible to submit an application through Flexible Funds for the gap of $12,500, to ensure they are not financially worse off under AGPT.
Dr Lee began their training on the RGTS in Semester 2, 2025. As part of their program, they are required to attend the face-to-face education workshops.
This subsidy is designed to offset the costs of attending the required education sessions.
Dr Ho is an RGTS registrar with a placement that runs from Semester 2, 2025 into Semester 1, 2026. They want to know if they need a new Medicare Provider Number (MPN).
Medicare has advised that the peak application period is late November, so registrars like Dr Ho should apply early to avoid delays in 2026.
Dr James is an RGTS registrar planning to commence their Adult Internal Medicine AST at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA over 2026. Adelaide is identified as an MMM1 location.
If Dr James were to remain on RGTS, they would not have been eligible to receive a payment for the year, as Adelaide is an MM1 location.
When Dr James transitions to AGPT, they will be eligible for funding for this placement under Flexible Funds.
AGPT registrars commencing their AST are eligible to receive a payment of $6,000 to subsidise the costs associated with completing the AST.
By transitioning to AGPT, Dr James will be eligible to receive a payment of $6,000.
Dr Nguyen commenced their training under RGTS in early 2024 and has been training full-time since then. They have already received four training support payments (one each semester).
Through the transition of RGTS registrars to AGPT, ACRRM will acknowledge the payments already made to registrars. Dr Nguyen's payment history and their eligibility for future payments under the National Consistent Payments (NCP) framework will be reviewed by ACRRM to ensure that the appropriate payments are applied for Semester 1, 2026 onwards.
This means:
Dr Johnson’s contractor agreement currently includes teaching time and supervision, so they’re unsure if they need to change anything.
To transition to employee status:
The practice updates the agreement to reflect a formal employee arrangement ensuring that the minimum NTCER conditions continue to be met.
Dr Devi is currently working as a contractor and prefers the independence and flexibility of invoicing through their ABN. When notified that all RGTS registrars transitioning into AGPT must be engaged as an employee from Semester 1, 2026, Dr Devi decides that they do not want to move to an employee arrangement.
To understand their options, Dr Devi:
To make an informed decision, Dr Devi seeks further guidance and support by:
After reviewing the financial and training implications, Dr Devi decides whether remaining a contractor on the self-funded pathway is sustainable, or whether transitioning to employee status under AGPT better supports their training.
Dr Martinez is a registrar who owns their rural training post. They currently pay themselves as a contractor and takes owner drawings.
With the transition to the AGPT funded pathway, all registrars (including owner-registrars) must be engaged as employees under the minimum conditions outlined in the NTCER by Semester 1, 2026.
What this means:
Dr Martinez should seek advice from their accountant or business advisor on setting up an employment arrangement within their existing business structure.
The payment rates for FTE in each MM will remain the same. As per below:
Indemnity insurers assess risk partly based on the registrar’s employment status, funding source, and the nature of their medical practice. A change in these factors could alter the terms of cover or premium.
Indemnity policies often require members to disclose changes in circumstances that could affect liability or risk exposure. If a registrar fails to notify their insurer, it could jeopardise their coverage in the event of a claim.