While the 2025–26 Federal Budget, released tonight, delivers some welcome investments in healthcare, the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) is urging all political parties to step up and prioritise rural, remote, and First Nations healthcare in their election platforms.
ACRRM President Dr Rod Martin says tonight’s Budget contained no surprises, reinforcing the need for a clear commitment from all sides of politics on how they will ensure funding reaches the communities that need it most.
“With an election on the horizon, this is the time for political leaders to put forward concrete plans that will make a real difference in rural and remote Australia,” Dr Martin says.
“The government has committed approximately $8.5 billion in healthcare funding over four years, and the Liberal Party of Australia has said they’ll match it - but there is little clarity on how much will directly benefit rural and remote Australians – they deserve detail and ACRRM expect it.”
Key budget highlights include:
“The sweetener is a $265.2 million investment to expand the pipeline of future General Practitioners (GPs) and Rural Generalists (RGs), supporting ACRRM’s ongoing call for at least 500 Rural Generalist training places annually,” Dr Martin says.
“We will be watching closely to ensure these training places are allocated where they are most needed, supporting the growing demand for ACRRM training, addressing the greatest and most urgent workforce shortages, and improving healthcare for people living in rural and remote communities,” Dr Martin says.
Despite these investments, Dr Martin says the Budget fails to address critical gaps in rural healthcare, including the ongoing closure of rural maternity services.
"The latest data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare shows that nearly 80,000 women give birth outside Australia’s cities each year," Dr Martin says.
"At the same time, reports of rural maternity unit closures continue to emerge from all corners of the country."
“Each closure weakens health in rural and remote communities just a little bit more.”
"There has been no commitment to turn this around.
“Targeted funding is desperately needed to attract and retain the rural maternity workforce, including Rural Generalists skilled in obstetrics and anaesthetics, to ensure women in rural and remote communities can access safe, high-quality maternity care close to home.
“We would also like to see RG-specific MBS item numbers to incentivise and support key specialised services in rural and remote locations that are currently grossly underserved.
“ACRRM will keep advocating for a Rural Health Service Providers Infrastructure Support Fund to address critical gaps in essential infrastructure, such as accommodation and childcare.
“Investing in these areas is key to making rural communities more liveable, sustainable, and attractive to healthcare professionals and their families.”
The College will now turn its attention to the upcoming election.
“Rural, remote and First Nations people deserve more than just broad healthcare funding announcements. “They need real solutions that ensure they receive quality, accessible and affordable healthcare that is sustainable and delivered as close to home as possible.”
While the 2025–26 Federal Budget, released tonight, delivers some welcome investments in healthcare, the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) is urging all political parties to step up and prioritise rural, remote, and First Nations healthcare in their election platforms.
ACRRM President Dr Rod Martin says tonight’s Budget contained no surprises, reinforcing the need for a clear commitment from all sides of politics on how they will ensure funding reaches the communities that need it most.
“With an election on the horizon, this is the time for political leaders to put forward concrete plans that will make a real difference in rural and remote Australia,” Dr Martin says.
“The government has committed approximately $8.5 billion in healthcare funding over four years, and the Liberal Party of Australia has said they’ll match it - but there is little clarity on how much will directly benefit rural and remote Australians – they deserve detail and ACRRM expect it.”
Key budget highlights include:
“The sweetener is a $265.2 million investment to expand the pipeline of future General Practitioners (GPs) and Rural Generalists (RGs), supporting ACRRM’s ongoing call for at least 500 Rural Generalist training places annually,” Dr Martin says.
“We will be watching closely to ensure these training places are allocated where they are most needed, supporting the growing demand for ACRRM training, addressing the greatest and most urgent workforce shortages, and improving healthcare for people living in rural and remote communities,” Dr Martin says.
Despite these investments, Dr Martin says the Budget fails to address critical gaps in rural healthcare, including the ongoing closure of rural maternity services.
"The latest data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare shows that nearly 80,000 women give birth outside Australia’s cities each year," Dr Martin says.
"At the same time, reports of rural maternity unit closures continue to emerge from all corners of the country."
“Each closure weakens health in rural and remote communities just a little bit more.”
"There has been no commitment to turn this around.
“Targeted funding is desperately needed to attract and retain the rural maternity workforce, including Rural Generalists skilled in obstetrics and anaesthetics, to ensure women in rural and remote communities can access safe, high-quality maternity care close to home.
“We would also like to see RG-specific MBS item numbers to incentivise and support key specialised services in rural and remote locations that are currently grossly underserved.
“ACRRM will keep advocating for a Rural Health Service Providers Infrastructure Support Fund to address critical gaps in essential infrastructure, such as accommodation and childcare.
“Investing in these areas is key to making rural communities more liveable, sustainable, and attractive to healthcare professionals and their families.”
The College will now turn its attention to the upcoming election.
“Rural, remote and First Nations people deserve more than just broad healthcare funding announcements. “They need real solutions that ensure they receive quality, accessible and affordable healthcare that is sustainable and delivered as close to home as possible.”